This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The petitioner sought to establish a data integration consultancy company in the United States.
Field: data integration consultancy · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
How the evidence was treated
- motion resubmission · discounted
“current motion brief is word-for-word identical to the previous motion brief”
AAO decision text
This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
This decision is purely procedural: the AAO dismissed a second combined motion to reopen/reconsider because the petitioner's brief was nearly identical to his prior motion brief and failed to address the AAO's most recent decision, rather than because the NIW prongs were reassessed. No substantive prong analysis occurred; the underlying denial (failure to merit the discretionary waiver) was left undisturbed from earlier proceedings not included in this text.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- Matter of O-S-G-
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Beneficiary proposed to establish an asset investment management and compliance advisory firm in New York offering c
- The Petitioner proposed to develop and commercialize zeolite-based products in the United States, including agricultural
- The Petitioner proposed to operate a medical billing and healthcare revenue cycle management firm in the United States,
- The Petitioner proposed to establish and lead as CEO a cybersecurity and crisis management company in Florida, offering
- The Petitioner proposed to establish and operate an IT consultancy company in Michigan providing cloud migration, cybers