dismissedSEP162025_01B52032025-09-16 · combined
This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The petitioner founded and directs an online platform offering learning, skills, and professional development content for the life sciences workforce.
Field: life sciences education technology · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive
“a business plan that lacked sufficient explanation to substantiate the projected scope of the company”
“the Petitioner has not explained the significance of the new data from Google Analytics”
“the record lacks information regarding the recognition or the criteria for selection, as well as any independent evidence”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- business plan · discounted
“lacked sufficient explanation to substantiate the projected scope of the company”
AAO decision text - other · discounted
“has not explained the significance of the new data from Google Analytics”
AAO decision text - media · discounted
“the record lacks information regarding the recognition or the criteria for selection”
AAO decision text - motion resubmission · discounted
“merely reargues facts and issues we have already considered in our previous decisions”
AAO decision text
Where this case turned
- Business plan speculative · p1 — projections without a documented basis or steps
- Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
1,358coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
This decision follows a prior appeal and three subsequent motions, all dismissed on the same first-prong ground; the AAO also resolved a procedural dispute over a mailing-address error in a prior decision, finding it did not warrant reopening because the petitioner had nonetheless timely responded on the merits.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(i)
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)
- Matter of Coelho
- Matter of O-S-G-
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Beneficiary proposed to establish an asset investment management and compliance advisory firm in New York offering c
- The Petitioner proposed to develop and commercialize zeolite-based products in the United States, including agricultural
- The Petitioner proposed to operate a medical billing and healthcare revenue cycle management firm in the United States,
- The Petitioner proposed to establish and lead as CEO a cybersecurity and crisis management company in Florida, offering
- The Petitioner proposed to establish and operate an IT consultancy company in Michigan providing cloud migration, cybers