This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The decision does not describe the substantive endeavor; it concerns only a procedural dismissal of a combined motion for failure to include a judicial-proceedings statement.
How the evidence was treated
- other · credited
This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
This decision does not address the merits of the NIW petition at all. The Director's combined motion to reopen/reconsider was dismissed solely for lack of a judicial-proceedings statement under 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(iii)(C); on appeal, the Petitioner supplied the missing statement, so the AAO withdrew the Director's decision and remanded for a new decision on the merits of the motion. No prong analysis occurred.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
What this case teaches
Analyst reading of the decision text.
Director's motion dismissal rested solely on missing judicial-proceedings statement under 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(1)(iii)(C); Petitioner cured this on appeal, requiring remand for merits review.
Always include the required statement on judicial proceedings with motions to reopen/reconsider to avoid summary procedural dismissal unrelated to substantive eligibility.
vague
mixed
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, an aircraft mechanic and instructor, proposed to enhance aviation maintenance training programs, support
- The Petitioner seeks EB-2 classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree with a national inter
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver of the job offer requirement, but the substance of the proposed e
- The Beneficiary, sponsored by a private airline, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability in a
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree; the sp