NIW Bearings
dismissedFEB112026_01B52032026-02-11 · motion_reconsider

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree; the specific proposed endeavor is not described in this procedural motion decision.

Read the decision (uscis.gov)

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    The Petitioner's contentions in their current motion merely reargue facts and issues we have already considered in our previous decisions.
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This is a purely procedural motion-to-reconsider dismissal — the second such motion in the proceedings (following an appeal and a combined motion to reopen and reconsider). The AAO did not re-examine the merits of any Dhanasar prong; it dismissed solely because the petitioner's arguments were substantively identical to those already raised and rejected, and a disagreement with the AAO's weighing of evidence does not constitute legal error. No new substantive analysis of the NIW prongs appears in this decision.

What this case teaches

Analyst reading of the decision text.

Decisive factor

Petitioner's second motion to reconsider merely reargued prior points and disagreed with evidence weighing, without identifying a specific legal or policy error in the prior decision, as required under 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3).

Transferable lesson

A motion to reconsider must pinpoint a specific misapplication of law or policy in the prior decision; rehashing prior arguments or disputing evidence weighing will fail.

Endeavor framing

vague

Evidence targeting

mixed

Cases in adjacent profiles