NIW Bearings
dismissedNOV122024_01B52032024-11-12 · combined · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The decision does not describe the underlying proposed endeavor; it addresses only the timeliness of a combined motion to reopen and reconsider a prior NIW appeal dismissal.

Read the decision (uscis.gov)

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    the FedEx receipt shows that she dropped off the motion at FedEx on May 25, 2024...scheduled delivery date was May 29, 2024, not May 28, 2024
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This decision is purely procedural: it resolves a combined motion to reopen and reconsider as untimely and does not reach or discuss the merits of the NIW eligibility (no prong analysis occurs). The AAO found the Petitioner's claim of postal delay factually contradicted by her own FedEx receipt, which showed a scheduled delivery date of May 29, 2024, one day later than she claimed.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(i)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)
  • Matter of Coelho

Cases in adjacent profiles