NIW Bearings
dismissedNOV042025_05B52032025-11-04 · appeal

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a project engineer with over 30 years of experience, proposed to advance his career through leadership positions and by founding his own engineering project management/consulting company offering control systems, industrial automation, and project engineering consulting, custom control valve products, and technical training.

Field: project engineering / industrial automation and control systems · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

the Petitioner did not establish that his proposed endeavor has national importance and thus, he did not meet the national importance requirement of the first prong
Benefits to a specific employer alone, even an employer with a national footprint, are not sufficiently relevant to the question of whether a person's endeavor has national importance.
the plan does not sufficiently detail the basis for the revenue and staffing projections, nor does it adequately explain how the revenue and staffing projections will be realized
the relevant question is not the importance of the field, industry, or profession in which the individual will work
the letters describe the Petitioner's job duties, rather than describing achievements that had broad implications to the field of project engineering
his opinion is general in nature, concluding that, because the Petitioner's proposed endeavor is to improve industrial automation, it has national importance

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • business plan · discounted
    generalized projections that are not specific and detailed enough to establish the potential prospective impact of his proposed endeavor
    AAO decision text
  • recommendation letter · discounted
    describe the Petitioner's job duties, rather than describing achievements that had broad implications to the field
    AAO decision text
  • other · discounted
    the advisory opinion is of little probative value as it does not meaningfully address the details of the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor
    AAO decision text
  • resume experience · discounted
    the Petitioner's skills, expertise, and abilities relate to the second prong of the Dhanasar framework
    AAO decision text
  • certification membership · ignored
All 7 evidence items
  • contract revenue · discounted
    does not include sufficient detail
    AAO decision text
  • motion resubmission · discounted
    references the same supporting evidence submitted with the original petition and RFE response and does not provide new evidence
    AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Business plan speculative · p1projections without a documented basis or steps
  • Economic claims unsupported · p1job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
  • Employer-specific benefit · p1"work furthers my company's product" — value accrues to one firm
  • Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
  • Letters conclusory · p1letters praise skills in general terms without tracing specific impact
  • Derivative of Prong 1/2 failure · p3prong three fails only because prongs one or two did — no independent ground
1,312coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

AAO discussed the SBA HUBZone program at length, rejecting Petitioner's attempt to use HUBZone location as evidence of 'substantial positive economic effects, particularly in an economically depressed area' under Dhanasar, finding he had not shown HUBZone certification eligibility and that the argument was 'too amorphous.' Footnote 5 provides an alternative holding that even if all prongs were reached, the appeal would still be dismissed because Petitioner submitted no new evidence on appeal.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • Matter of L-A-C-
  • Poursina v. USCIS

Cases in adjacent profiles