NIW Bearings
dismissedMAY302023_03B52032023-05-30 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a financial and investment analyst and entrepreneur, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability with a waiver of the job offer requirement; the specific proposed endeavor was not addressed because the case failed at the threshold classification stage.

Field: financial and investment analysis · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

The Director found the Petitioner satisfied only two of six evidentiary criteria for exceptional ability under 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A)-(F); the Petitioner did not contest this finding on appeal, so it was deemed waived and was dispositive.

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The AAO dismissed the appeal solely on the ground that the Petitioner failed to contest the Director's threshold finding of ineligibility for exceptional-ability classification (deeming it waived), and expressly declined to reach any of the Dhanasar NIW prongs, citing INS v. Bagamasbad and Matter of L-A-C- for the principle that unnecessary issues need not be decided.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(3)(iii)
  • Matter of L-A-C-
  • USCIS Policy Manual F.5(B)(2)

Cases in adjacent profiles