This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, a statistician, sought to work in her field in the United States, though the specifics of the endeavor are not detailed in this motion decision.
Field: statistics · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
How the evidence was treated
- motion resubmission · discounted
“is not a sufficiently specific statement as to how the AAO erred as a matter of law or policy”
AAO decision text
This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
This is a motion to reconsider, not a merits appeal; the AAO dismissed it purely on procedural grounds for lacking specificity as to legal or policy error, incorporating the prior appellate decision (which had found national importance under prong 1 unestablished) by reference rather than re-analyzing it. The Petitioner's motion raised an unusual and unsupported Fourth Amendment constitutional argument regarding USCIS's handling of evidence.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(i)
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)
- INA 203(b)(2)
- Matter of O-S-G-
- Section 291 of the Act
What this case teaches
Analyst reading of the decision text.
The motion failed to identify any specific legal or policy error in the prior AAO decision, instead reasserting general disagreement and STEM-skill claims already addressed under prong two.
A motion to reconsider must pinpoint a specific legal/policy error in the prior decision, not restate general arguments about skill or competitiveness already considered.
vague
stem_positive_factor · us_competitiveness · economic_growth_generic
person_focused
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, an aircraft mechanic and instructor, proposed to enhance aviation maintenance training programs, support
- The Petitioner seeks EB-2 classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree with a national inter
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver of the job offer requirement, but the substance of the proposed e
- The Beneficiary, sponsored by a private airline, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability in a
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree; the sp