This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The decision does not describe the underlying endeavor; it addresses only the procedural adequacy of the Petitioner's motion to reconsider a prior appeal dismissal.
How the evidence was treated
- motion resubmission · discounted
“has not specified the factual and legal issues raised on appeal that were decided in error or overlooked”
AAO decision text
This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
This decision addresses only a motion to reconsider the AAO's own prior dismissal of the appeal, not the underlying NIW merits; the AAO found the motion improperly attempted to relitigate the earlier denial rather than identify errors in the AAO's dismissal, and dismissed it on procedural grounds without reaching any NIW prongs.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(i)
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, an aircraft mechanic and instructor, proposed to enhance aviation maintenance training programs, support
- The Petitioner seeks EB-2 classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree with a national inter
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver of the job offer requirement, but the substance of the proposed e
- The Beneficiary, sponsored by a private airline, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability in a
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree; the sp