NIW Bearings
dismissedJUN272023_02B52032023-06-27 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner sought classification as an individual of exceptional ability with a national interest waiver, apparently in connection with work related to motor vehicle dealership activities, though the specific proposed endeavor is not detailed in this threshold-level denial.

Field: motor vehicle dealership/sales · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

The Petitioner failed to establish at least three of the six exceptional ability criteria under 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(3)(ii); the Director's finding that criterion (A) was met (based on a two-day motor vehicle dealer training certificate) was withdrawn, leaving only two criteria satisfied.

How the evidence was treated

  • certification membership · discounted
    recognizing a certificate for completing a two-day training seminar as an award similar to a degree...strains plausibility
    AAO decision text
  • degree · discounted
    Neither the photocopy of the Petitioner's certificate of completion nor the printout of section 320.27...is an official academic record.
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The decision is resolved entirely at the threshold exceptional-ability stage and never reaches the Dhanasar NIW prongs, which the AAO explicitly declines to address (citing Bagamasbad and Matter of L-A-C-). The dispositive issue is whether a two-day motor vehicle dealer training seminar certificate qualifies as an 'official academic record' under 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A); the AAO held it does not, both because the certificate itself is not the type of degree/diploma contemplated and because a photocopy is not an 'official academic record.' The underlying occupation/endeavor is barely described in the redacted text.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(3)(ii)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(3)(iii)
  • Kazarian v. USCIS
  • Matter of L-A-C-
  • Visinscaia v. Beers

Cases in adjacent profiles