NIW Bearings
dismissedJUN262025_01B52032025-06-26 · motion_reopen

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The decision does not describe the underlying proposed endeavor; it addresses only the procedural question of whether a prior (fifth) motion to reopen was timely filed.

Read the decision (uscis.gov)

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    the Petitioner did not submit evidence to corroborate his claims that his fifth motion filing was erroneously rejected
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This is the sixth motion to reopen in a long procedural history (denial, combined motions, appeal, remand, further dismissals, three prior motions dismissed as untimely). The AAO does not reach the merits of the NIW eligibility or any Dhanasar prong; it dismisses solely because the Petitioner failed to corroborate a claim that USCIS Lockbox erroneously rejected his fifth motion filing, and because the record of the prior (untimely) motion itself lacked the alleged rejected filing.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(i)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)
  • Matter of Coelho

Cases in adjacent profiles