NIW Bearings
dismissedJUN262024_08B52032024-06-26 · motion_reconsider · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The record does not specify the Petitioner's proposed endeavor, as the AAO's prior decision and this motion focused solely on threshold EB-2 eligibility rather than the nature of the work.

Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

Petitioner submitted vocational education evidence not equivalent to a U.S. baccalaureate or higher degree, and met only two of the required three regulatory criteria for exceptional ability.

How the evidence was treated

  • degree · discounted
    he submitted evidence of vocational education, which is not equivalent to a United States baccalaureate or higher degree
    AAO decision text
  • motion resubmission · discounted
    he claims he submitted sufficient evidence to meet additional criteria
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This decision only addresses threshold EB-2 eligibility (advanced degree/exceptional ability); the AAO expressly declined to reach the Dhanasar national interest waiver framework because ineligibility for EB-2 classification was dispositive.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(3)(ii)
  • Matter of L-A-C-

Cases in adjacent profiles