NIW Bearings
dismissedJUN252024_09B52032024-06-25 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a business administrator, proposed to direct a human resources consulting and recruitment company she planned to establish in Florida.

Field: human resources consulting and recruitment / business administration · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

Petitioner held only a bachelor's-equivalent degree and failed to establish the master's-degree equivalent via five years of progressive experience because she did not submit letters from current or former employers as required by 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(3)(i)(B); colleague letters and a government work permit did not qualify.

How the evidence was treated

  • recommendation letter · discounted
    Their letters do not state that they employed the Petitioner.
    AAO decision text
  • resume experience · discounted
    The Petitioner's Work and Social Security Digital Permit is not a letter from a current or former employer.
    AAO decision text
  • degree · credited

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

Threshold EB-2 advanced-degree-equivalency determination was dispositive; the AAO expressly declined to reach the national interest waiver prongs, citing INS v. Bagamasbad and Matter of L-A-C- for reserving unnecessary issues.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(g)(1)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • Matter of L-A-C-

Cases in adjacent profiles