NIW Bearings
dismissedJUN212024_08B52032024-06-21 · combined · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The decision does not describe the underlying proposed endeavor; the petition sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability with an accompanying national interest waiver, but this motion decision addresses only procedural deficiencies.

Read the decision (uscis.gov)

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    the Petitioner submits no new facts or documentary evidence in support of the motion to reopen
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The AAO's decision is purely procedural: it dismisses the motion to reopen for lack of new facts/evidence and the motion to reconsider for failing to specify any incorrect application of law or policy. The Petitioner's Fifth Amendment due-process argument was rejected as vague ('he does not discuss how'). No substantive national-interest-waiver analysis occurs in this document.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)
  • Matter of Coelho

Cases in adjacent profiles