NIW Bearings
dismissedJUN132023_05B52032023-06-13 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner sought to continue owning and operating his automotive repair shop in the United States.

Field: automotive repair / operations management · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

Petitioner failed to establish eligibility as an individual of exceptional ability; evidence showed training and experience but not expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field. Also failed to establish advanced degree professional eligibility due to lack of any bachelor's-level academic credentials.

How the evidence was treated

  • degree · discounted
    nothing in the record reflects that the Petitioner has any formal academic education at the baccalaureate level
    AAO decision text
  • resume experience · discounted
    Possessing the training needed to perform an occupation and having experience in the occupation are not sufficient
    AAO decision text
  • recommendation letter · discounted
  • awards · discounted
    the Petitioner has not explained nor documented the process by which these customer service awards were determined
    AAO decision text
  • certification membership · discounted

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

AAO did not reach the Dhanasar prongs at all, expressly reserving opinion on them because the threshold EB-2 exceptional ability determination was dispositive; Petitioner's appeal brief failed to address the Director's threshold finding, resulting in waiver of that issue under Matter of R-A-M-.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • Kazarian v. USCIS
  • Matter of R-A-M-
  • Poursina v. USCIS

Cases in adjacent profiles