dismissedJUL312024_14B52032024-07-31 · appeal · Texas Service Center
This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, an experienced pilot and flight standards/training manager, proposed to work in the United States as a pilot and aviation instructor training new pilots to obtain type ratings and FAA licensure.
Field: aviation / piloting and flight instruction · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive
“Thus, labor shortages, in general, are insufficient to establish an endeavor is of national importance.”
“It is not the field or industry but the endeavor itself that the individual will carry out that must be shown to be of national importance.”
“the actual activities he would be engaged in would not impact the field of aviation at a level commensurate with national importance”
“the Petitioner has not established that the number of pilots he would train would lead to enough new pilots to bolster his claim”
“the Petitioner does not provide specific evidence to establish his work as a pilot and instructor would have an economic impact, create jobs”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- other · discounted
“labor shortages, in general, are insufficient to establish an endeavor is of national importance”
AAO decision text - recommendation letter · discounted
“these general assertions relate primarily to the national importance of the aviation field, but they do not attest to the broad potential implications of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor”
AAO decision text - resume experience · ignored
“the Petitioner's work experience and qualifications... are not relevant to our first prong analysis”
AAO decision text - certification membership · ignored
Where this case turned
- Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
- Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
- Local, not national scope · p1 — impact confined to clients / a region
- Occupational shortage argument rejected · p1 — argues a labor shortage — the labor-certification question, not Dhanasar
2,501coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
AAO footnoted, without deciding, that aviation may not qualify as a science, art, or business field under the exceptional-ability statute, but declined to dismiss on that unaddressed basis for lack of notice to Petitioner; the appeal was instead dismissed solely on prong one national importance grounds.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.3
- 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
- INA 203(b)(2)
- Matter of Ho
- Matter of L-A-C-
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, an aircraft mechanic and instructor, proposed to enhance aviation maintenance training programs, support
- The Petitioner seeks EB-2 classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree with a national inter
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver of the job offer requirement, but the substance of the proposed e
- The Beneficiary, sponsored by a private airline, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability in a
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree; the sp