NIW Bearings
dismissedJUL302024_15B52032024-07-30 · motion_reopen · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a cybersecurity entrepreneur, sought to work in the United States in a cybersecurity-related endeavor, though the decision does not detail the specific proposed work.

Field: cybersecurity · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    the facts and evidence submitted on motion do not address or otherwise overcome the basis for our decision to summarily dismiss the prior appeal
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This decision does not reach the NIW merits at all; it is a motion to reopen a prior summary dismissal of an appeal (for failure to file a brief identifying error). The Petitioner raised an ineffective assistance of counsel claim but failed to comply with Matter of Lozada requirements (affidavit, notice to prior counsel, disciplinary complaint), so the motion was dismissed on procedural grounds without any substantive prong analysis.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5
  • Matter of Coelho

Cases in adjacent profiles