The decision does not describe the underlying endeavor; it addresses only the timeliness of the Petitioner's prior motion following denial of an NIW petition for an entrepreneur.

How the evidence was treated

• motion resubmission · discounted

  “it is not accompanied by evidence that the package was in fact mailed via USPS on that date”

  AAO decision text

Notable

This decision does not reach the merits of the NIW petition at all; it is purely a procedural dismissal of combined motions to reopen/reconsider a prior summary dismissal, based on untimeliness of the underlying motion (Petitioner's USPS Click-N-Ship label showed only a ship date, not proof of actual timely mailing/delivery) and failure to identify any legal or factual error for reconsideration.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

• 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(i)
• 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
• 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
• 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
• 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)
• Matter of Coelho

Cases in adjacent profiles

• The Beneficiary proposed to establish an asset investment management and compliance advisory firm in New York offering c
• The Petitioner proposed to develop and commercialize zeolite-based products in the United States, including agricultural
• The Petitioner proposed to operate a medical billing and healthcare revenue cycle management firm in the United States,
• The Petitioner proposed to establish and lead as CEO a cybersecurity and crisis management company in Florida, offering
• The Petitioner proposed to establish and operate an IT consultancy company in Michigan providing cloud migration, cybers