This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, a Panamanian commercial pilot (Chief Pilot and Captain, Flight Operations), sought to continue working as a pilot in the United States.
Field: commercial aviation / piloting · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
EB-2 threshold — not met
AAO found the Petitioner did not establish at least three of six exceptional-ability criteria (withdrawing SCOPS' contrary finding on experience, salary, and membership criteria) and, in the alternative final merits determination, found the totality of evidence did not show a degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field.
How the evidence was treated
- degree · credited
- certification membership · credited
- certification membership · discounted
“The record does not contain documents describing these associations or their requirements for membership.”
AAO decision text - resume experience · discounted
“The letter does not provide what the Petitioner's roles were for the company prior to her obtaining her current title.”
AAO decision text - recommendation letter · discounted
“they do not describe her recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry.”
AAO decision text
All 6 evidence items
- other · discounted
“the report does not distinguish salary by types of pilots and does not specify the salary for commercial pilots.”
AAO decision text
This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
The AAO found the underlying EB-2 exceptional-ability classification unmet, which was dispositive; it expressly declined to reach the Petitioner's national interest waiver arguments, citing INS v. Bagamasbad and Matter of L-A-C- for the principle that agencies need not reach unnecessary issues.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.3
- 8 C.F.R. 204.5(g)(1)
- 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(3)(ii)
- Flores v. Garland
- INA 203(b)(2)
- Matter of L-A-C-
- USCIS Policy Manual F.5(B)(2)
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, an aircraft mechanic and instructor, proposed to enhance aviation maintenance training programs, support
- The Petitioner seeks EB-2 classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree with a national inter
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver of the job offer requirement, but the substance of the proposed e
- The Beneficiary, sponsored by a private airline, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability in a
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree; the sp