NIW Bearings
dismissedJUL092024_05B52032024-07-09 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The decision does not describe the Petitioner's proposed endeavor, as the case was resolved entirely on threshold EB-2 classification eligibility without reaching the national interest waiver analysis.

Field: human resources management / logistics · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

Petitioner held only an associate's degree and did not qualify as an advanced-degree professional; she did not timely claim or establish eligibility as an individual of exceptional ability, raising specific regulatory criteria for the first time on appeal.

How the evidence was treated

  • degree · discounted
    the Petitioner did not demonstrate her receipt of an associate's degree qualified her as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree
    AAO decision text
  • resume experience · discounted
    the Petitioner does not argue how the evidence establishes her degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The AAO did not reach the national interest waiver analysis at all because the Petitioner failed the threshold EB-2 classification requirement (neither advanced-degree professional nor exceptional ability). The AAO declined to consider exceptional-ability criteria arguments raised for the first time on appeal, citing a Supreme Court footnote (Vullo) for the waiver-of-unraised-issues principle rather than typical immigration precedent.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(3)(ii)
  • Chen v. INS
  • Matter of L-A-C-
  • Matter of O-R-E-
  • Matter of R-A-M-

Cases in adjacent profiles