The Petitioner, a priest, proposed to continue serving the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the USA congregation in Connecticut by providing ongoing spiritual and emotional care to church members.

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

“The record does not sufficiently describe how ministering to the spiritual needs of Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the USA adherents in Connecticut would have broader national or global implications rising to a level of national importance.”

“The national interest waiver is not designed to address labor shortages.”

“The record does not contain sufficient evidence reflecting a substantial positive economic effect stemming from the Petitioner's specific endeavor and how it rose to a level of national importance.”

“But the key deficiency in the writer's statements is that it neglected to analyze the Petitioner's proposed endeavor's impact.”

“the wide-ranging potential "benefits" identified by the writer diluted the Petitioner's proposed endeavor because they did not correlate to the Petitioner's proposed endeavor”

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

• recommendation letter · discounted

  “the submission of letters from experts supporting the petition is not presumptive evidence of eligibility”

  AAO decision text
• degree · credited
• certification membership · discounted

  “the validity of the Petitioner's status as a priest of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the USA is not pertinent”

  AAO decision text

Where this case turned

• Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
• Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
• Local, not national scope · p1 — impact confined to clients / a region
• Occupational shortage argument rejected · p1 — argues a labor shortage — the labor-certification question, not Dhanasar

Notable

The AAO withdrew the Director's willful-misrepresentation finding regarding the Petitioner's defrocking as clergy for lack of developed record, while cautioning the Petitioner to be prepared to address the veracity of representations in future proceedings. The decision devotes extensive analysis to critiquing an expert opinion from a sociology professor, faulting it for conflating 'spirituality' and 'religion,' relying on generic claims about religion's societal benefits untethered to the Petitioner's specific endeavor, and improperly invoking a White House faith-based initiative with no shown connection to the Petitioner. The AAO also viewed with skepticism the Petitioner's post-filing pivot to framing the endeavor around the Ukrainian invasion crisis, which began 13 months after filing, citing Matter of Katigbak and Matter of Izummi against material after-the-fact changes.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

• 8 C.F.R. 103.3
• INA 203(b)(2)
• Matter of Caron Int'l
• Matter of Ho
• Matter of Izummi
• Matter of Katigbak
• Matter of L-A-C-
• Poursina v. USCIS

Cases in adjacent profiles

• The Petitioner, an aircraft mechanic and instructor, proposed to enhance aviation maintenance training programs, support
• The Petitioner seeks EB-2 classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree with a national inter
• The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver of the job offer requirement, but the substance of the proposed e
• The Beneficiary, sponsored by a private airline, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability in a
• The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree; the sp