The decision does not describe the underlying endeavor; it is a procedural ruling on a fourth combined motion following prior dismissals of the NIW appeal.

How the evidence was treated

• motion resubmission · discounted

  “the Petitioner reiterates her claim that she has established that she is eligible for a national interest waiver, claims that have already been considered”

  AAO decision text

Notable

This decision is purely procedural: it is the AAO's dismissal of a fourth combined motion to reopen/reconsider, finding no new facts and no assertion of legal or factual error in the prior decision. No substantive prong analysis occurs; the AAO expressly declines to re-adjudicate the underlying NIW eligibility, citing Matter of O-S-G- for the principle that a motion to reconsider cannot merely rehash prior arguments.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

• 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(i)
• 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
• 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
• 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
• Matter of O-S-G-

Cases in adjacent profiles

• The Petitioner, an aircraft mechanic and instructor, proposed to enhance aviation maintenance training programs, support
• The Petitioner seeks EB-2 classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree with a national inter
• The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver of the job offer requirement, but the substance of the proposed e
• The Beneficiary, sponsored by a private airline, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability in a
• The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree; the sp