NIW Bearings
dismissedJUL012024_02B52032024-07-01 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a real estate entrepreneur, sought to work in business administration-related endeavors in the United States, though the specific national-interest endeavor was not reached due to threshold ineligibility.

Field: business administration / real estate · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

Petitioner claimed a foreign bachelor's equivalent plus 11 years of progressive experience to equal a master's degree under 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2), but employment verification letters were self-written and lacked required details on progressive duties, full-time/part-time status, and were not from current or former employers.

How the evidence was treated

  • resume experience · discounted
    the letters did not detail progressive experience, any changes in duties over time, or whether the positions were full-time or part-time
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

AAO reserved/declined to reach the Dhanasar national interest waiver analysis entirely because the Petitioner failed at the threshold EB-2 advanced-degree-professional stage; employment verification letters were written by the Petitioner himself rather than by employers as required by regulation.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(g)(1)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • Matter of E-M-
  • Matter of L-A-C-

Cases in adjacent profiles