This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner proposed to establish a company providing IT consulting services to U.S. companies, including cybersecurity and IT management/governance consultancy.
Field: IT consulting / cybersecurity · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive
“this material does not establish that the Petitioner's initial endeavor is of national impo1tance but instead provides general information about the field in which he originally intended to work.”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- motion resubmission · discounted
“the scope of a motion is limited to "the prior decision" and "the latest decision in the proceeding."”
AAO decision text - other · discounted
“provides general information about the field in which he originally intended to work.”
AAO decision text
Where this case turned
- Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
Notable
This is the fourth adverse decision on the same petition (appeal, motion to reconsider, combined motion to reopen/reconsider, and this motion to reopen). A prior combined motion introduced an alternate proposed endeavor, which the AAO treated as a material change to the petition and declined to consider under Matter of Izummi/Katigbak; the current motion's new evidence was rejected because it addressed the original endeavor's field generally rather than curing the material-change/national-importance defect identified in the AAO's most recent prior decision.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.2(b)(1)
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)
- Matter of Coelho
- Matter of Izummi
- Matter of Katigbak
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Beneficiary proposed to establish an asset investment management and compliance advisory firm in New York offering c
- The Petitioner proposed to develop and commercialize zeolite-based products in the United States, including agricultural
- The Petitioner proposed to operate a medical billing and healthcare revenue cycle management firm in the United States,
- The Petitioner proposed to establish and lead as CEO a cybersecurity and crisis management company in Florida, offering
- The Petitioner proposed to establish and operate an IT consultancy company in Michigan providing cloud migration, cybers