NIW Bearings
dismissedJAN212025_07B52032025-01-21 · combined · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner sought to operate a consulting company providing services to other businesses in the field of production engineering.

Field: production engineering · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

The articles may demonstrate the importance of these services for businesses, but the Petitioner has not provided sufficient evidence to show that his specific endeavor would meet the national importance element of the first prong under Dhanasar.

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • business plan · discounted
    we must focus on the Petitioner's particular venture
    AAO decision text
  • motion resubmission · discounted
    the Petitioner repeats verbatim several of his arguments ... without explaining why we should find these claims any more persuasive than before
    AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Endeavor too vague · p1described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
  • Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
1,581coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This is a second combined motion to reopen/reconsider following a prior dismissed appeal and prior dismissed combined motion; AAO's review was limited to its own prior (September 2024) motion decision, not the original Director denial, per 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii).

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5
  • Matter of Coelho

Cases in adjacent profiles