NIW Bearings
dismissedJAN162025_03B52032025-01-16 · combined · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner sought to establish an educational services firm headquartered in Massachusetts that would provide Christian education.

Field: early childhood/Christian education · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

Prior appeal decision found Petitioner did not establish her degree was foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree or that she had five years of progressive experience in the specialty; motion did not overcome this.

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

“we concurred with the Director's determination that the Petitioner did not establish that her proposed endeavor has national importance”
“the Petitioner does not provide any new evidence or arguments which overcome our prior determination”

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    “the Petitioner does not provide any new evidence or arguments which overcome our prior determination”
    AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Endeavor too vague · p1 — described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
1,619coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →

Notable

This is a motion decision reviewing a prior AAO appeal dismissal; the AAO did not re-examine the merits in depth but held the Petitioner failed to present new facts or legal error sufficient to disturb the prior dispositive finding on national importance (prong 1) and the threshold EB-2 advanced-degree determination.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • Matter of Coelho

Cases in adjacent profiles