dismissedJAN112024_07B52032024-01-11 · appeal · Texas Service Center
This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner proposed to open a studio/laboratory in Florida offering structural and hydraulic design services, soil and concrete material testing, and construction consulting, including flood-mitigation building practices, while also training workers in construction trades.
Field: civil/structural engineering, construction, soil and materials testing · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive
“the Petitioner must demonstrate the national importance of his specific, proposed endeavor of his particular services through his business rather than the importance of any of the topics or the industry or the field.”
“the record does not show through supporting documentation how his specific services or business would stand to sufficiently extend beyond his prospective clients, to impact the industry or the U.S. economy more broadly”
“the personal statements do not discuss how his particular endeavor would result in substantial economic benefits.”
“the record does not establish that, beyond the limited benefits provided to his prospective clients, the Petitioner's proposed endeavor has broader implications rising to the level of having national importance”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- other · discounted
“the personal statements reference overall figures... The Petitioner does not claim or make any arguments relating to how his proposed endeavor would substantially benefit”
AAO decision text - business plan · discounted
“the Petitioner did not establish how his services or business would have a broader impact...rather than limited to the projects involving the Petitioner or his business”
AAO decision text
Where this case turned
- Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
- Endeavor too vague · p1 — described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
- Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
- Local, not national scope · p1 — impact confined to clients / a region
2,501coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
The Director had found substantial merit satisfied but national importance not met; AAO focused solely on national importance and declined to reach prongs 2 and 3, expressly noting the dismissal rests on an independent and alternate basis.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.3
- Matter of L-A-C-
- Poursina v. USCIS
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Beneficiary proposed to establish an asset investment management and compliance advisory firm in New York offering c
- The Petitioner proposed to develop and commercialize zeolite-based products in the United States, including agricultural
- The Petitioner proposed to operate a medical billing and healthcare revenue cycle management firm in the United States,
- The Petitioner proposed to establish and lead as CEO a cybersecurity and crisis management company in Florida, offering
- The Petitioner proposed to establish and operate an IT consultancy company in Michigan providing cloud migration, cybers