This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The decision does not describe the underlying proposed endeavor; it addresses only procedural motions following prior denials.
How the evidence was treated
- motion resubmission · discounted
“she does not offer new facts supported by evidence or elaborate on any change in her circumstances”
AAO decision text
This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
This is a purely procedural decision on the Petitioner's seventh set of motions (combined motion to reopen and reconsider) following an appeal dismissal and six prior motion dismissals. No substantive NIW prong analysis occurs; the AAO limits its review to whether the immediately prior (September 2024) decision was properly challenged, finding no new evidence or legal error identified.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, an aircraft mechanic and instructor, proposed to enhance aviation maintenance training programs, support
- The Petitioner seeks EB-2 classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree with a national inter
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver of the job offer requirement, but the substance of the proposed e
- The Beneficiary, sponsored by a private airline, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability in a
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree; the sp