NIW Bearings
dismissedFEB242025_04B52032025-02-24 · combined · Nebraska Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The decision does not describe the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor; the record instead centers on whether her foreign accounting credentials and work experience are equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree plus five years of progressive experience.

Field: accounting · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

AAO found the Petitioner did not establish her foreign diplomas equate to a U.S. bachelor's degree (each required less than four years of study) and that the record did not clarify whether her seven years of work were truly post-baccalaureate; this threshold failure was dispositive and the NIW prongs were never reached.

How the evidence was treated

  • degree · discounted
    the Petitioner did not show how either diploma is the equivalent to the four years of study generally required for a U.S. bachelor's degree
    AAO decision text
  • resume experience · discounted
    it is not clear whether the Petitioner's seven years of work are in fact years of "post-baccalaureate" work as noted by the evaluator
    AAO decision text
  • other · discounted
    where an opinion is not in accord with other information or is any way questionable, we may discount or give less weight to that evaluation
    AAO decision text
  • motion resubmission · discounted
    the Petitioner has not presented new facts that overcomes our prior decision to dismiss the appeal
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The case turned entirely on the threshold advanced-degree-equivalency issue (foreign diplomas plus post-baccalaureate experience); the NIW prongs were never analyzed. A footnote notes the Petitioner waived any exceptional-ability classification claim on motion, citing Matter of O-R-E- and Matter of R-A-M-.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • Matter of Coelho
  • Matter of O-R-E-
  • Matter of O-S-G-
  • Matter of R-A-M-

Cases in adjacent profiles