This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner proposed an endeavor of national importance, the specific nature of which is not described in this decision; prior decisions found the endeavor lacked national importance under Matter of Dhanasar.
How the evidence was treated
- motion resubmission · discounted
“he submits substantively identical documentation to what was submitted with his most recent motion”
AAO decision text
This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
This is a late-stage procedural dismissal with an extensive prior history: SCOPS denial, a combined motion dismissed and appealed, AAO withdrawal and remand, a second SCOPS dismissal, a second AAO appeal dismissal, multiple timeliness-dismissed motions, and two prior motions to reopen dismissed for lack of new facts — making this at least the seventh or eighth AAO/SCOPS action on the same petition. The AAO did not reach the merits of any NIW prong; dismissal was solely on the ground that the Petitioner again submitted substantively identical documentation without new facts. The AAO also noted that evidence submitted after filing the prior motion was rejected as improperly filed under Form I-290B instructions.
What this case teaches
Analyst reading of the decision text.
This is a procedural motion-to-reopen dismissal: petitioner submitted substantively identical documentation and arguments already rejected, failing the requirement of new facts supported by documentary evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2).
A motion to reopen must present genuinely new, documented facts capable of changing the outcome; resubmitting prior evidence or arguments will be summarily dismissed.
vague
other
person_focused
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, an aircraft mechanic and instructor, proposed to enhance aviation maintenance training programs, support
- The Petitioner seeks EB-2 classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree with a national inter
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver of the job offer requirement, but the substance of the proposed e
- The Beneficiary, sponsored by a private airline, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability in a
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree; the sp