This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The decision does not describe the underlying proposed endeavor; it addresses only the procedural sufficiency of a second motion to reconsider.
How the evidence was treated
- motion resubmission · discounted
“reargue facts and issues we have already considered in our previous decisions”
AAO decision text
This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
This is a second motion to reconsider following a prior dismissed appeal and dismissed first motion to reconsider; the AAO declines to re-adjudicate the underlying national importance merits, limiting review strictly to whether the immediately prior decision misapplied law or policy under 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3). No substantive prong analysis occurs in this decision.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5
- Matter of O-S-G-
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, an aircraft mechanic and instructor, proposed to enhance aviation maintenance training programs, support
- The Petitioner seeks EB-2 classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree with a national inter
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver of the job offer requirement, but the substance of the proposed e
- The Beneficiary, sponsored by a private airline, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability in a
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree; the sp