dismissedFEB092016_09B52032016-02-09 · appeal · Texas Service Center
This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, an author and lecturer, sought to disseminate his self-improvement books and motivational lectures on social harmony, family life, and financial success in the United States.
Field: self-improvement writing and motivational lecturing · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
Prong 1 — national importanceestablished
“The Petitioner has established that his work as an author and lecturer is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit that the proposed benefits of his self-improvement books and motivational lectures would be national in scope.”
AAO decision text
Prong 3 — balance of factorsnot established · dispositive
“there is no documentary evidence showing that his books, lectures, and training sessions have influenced the field at a level sufficient to waive the job offer requirement”
“Generalized conclusory assertions that do not identify specific contributions or their impact in the field have little probative value.”
“the record does not establish that the Petitioner's work has influenced the field as a whole or that he will otherwise serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker”
“Any assertion that a petitioner possesses useful skills and experiences, or a "unique background" relates to whether similarly-trained workers are available in the United States and is an issue under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Labor”
“there is no documentary evidence demonstrating that his published work has influenced the field as a whole”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- recommendation letter · discounted
“there is no documentary evidence showing that his books, lectures, and training sessions have influenced the field at a level sufficient to waive the job offer requirement”
AAO decision text - contract revenue · discounted
“there is no documentary evidence demonstrating that his published work has influenced the field as a whole”
AAO decision text - awards · discounted
“he has not demonstrated that the awards he received have more than regional or institutional significance”
AAO decision text - certification membership · discounted
“there is nothing inherent in these activities to establish eligibility for the national interest waiver”
AAO decision text - media · discounted
“does not indicate that his work has had a national effect or has otherwise influenced the field as a whole”
AAO decision text
All 6 evidence items
- other · ignored
“we will not consider any English language versions of the Petitioner's books that were not yet published as of the filing date”
AAO decision text
Where this case turned
- Economic claims unsupported · p3 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
- Letters conclusory · p3 — letters praise skills in general terms without tracing specific impact
- Letters not independent · p3 — letters come from employers and close collaborators, not independent experts
- Record of success insufficient · p3 — a claimed track record the documents do not establish
- U.S. worker availability · p3 — the impracticality of a labour-market test was asserted, not established
2,501coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
Legacy NYSDOT three-prong framework applied (pre-Dhanasar). AAO conceded prongs 1 and 2 (intrinsic merit and national scope) were met but dismissed solely on the third NYSDOT prong (comparative benefit over U.S. workers), mapped here to p3. AAO also discounted untranslated/improperly certified Arabic-language award documents and unpublished English translations as not yet in existence at filing date, citing Matter of Katigbak.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.2(b)(1)
- 8 C.F.R. 103.2(b)(3)
- Matter of Katigbak
- Matter of Otiende
- Matter of V-K-
- Visinscaia v. Beers
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, a musician and music educator, proposed to advance music education in the United States by opening a pia
- The petitioner, a tattoo artist, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability along with a nationa
- The Petitioner, an MMA athlete and trainer, proposed to operate a jiu jitsu company through which he would train and com
- The Petitioner sought to establish an arts education academy in Ohio, with plans to expand to New York and Michigan, off
- The Petitioner, an art curator, proposed to establish a nonprofit cultural center/platform focused on exhibitions, oral