dismissedDEC162024_01B52032024-12-16 · motion_reconsider · Texas Service Center
This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, a chief executive officer, proposed an endeavor he claimed would significantly impact the national economy and benefit national security, though specifics are not detailed in this decision.
How the evidence was treated
- motion resubmission · discounted
“he merely reasserts arguments we have already considered and found unpersuasive in both of our previous decisions”
AAO decision text
This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
This is a motion to reconsider following a prior motion to reopen/reconsider that was already dismissed; the AAO's review was limited to its latest decision and did not re-examine the merits of the NIW prongs, which were addressed in earlier, unprovided decisions.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5
- Matter of O-S-G-
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Beneficiary proposed to establish an asset investment management and compliance advisory firm in New York offering c
- The Petitioner proposed to develop and commercialize zeolite-based products in the United States, including agricultural
- The Petitioner proposed to operate a medical billing and healthcare revenue cycle management firm in the United States,
- The Petitioner proposed to establish and lead as CEO a cybersecurity and crisis management company in Florida, offering
- The Petitioner proposed to establish and operate an IT consultancy company in Michigan providing cloud migration, cybers