The Petitioner, an accountant, sought a national interest waiver of the job offer requirement for EB-2 classification; the underlying merits of her proposed endeavor were not reached.

How the evidence was treated

• motion resubmission · discounted

  “the Petitioner has neither claimed nor presented evidence that the brief was properly submitted in accordance with the form instructions”

  AAO decision text

Notable

This decision is procedural, not a merits decision on the NIW petition. The AAO previously summarily dismissed the appeal for failure to timely submit a brief to the correct address (AAO instead of Texas Service Center), and on motion to reopen found the Petitioner still failed to show the brief was properly submitted, so it never reached the underlying national interest waiver claims.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

• 8 C.F.R. 103.5
• 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(i)
• 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
• 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)

Cases in adjacent profiles

• The Petitioner, an aircraft mechanic and instructor, proposed to enhance aviation maintenance training programs, support
• The Petitioner seeks EB-2 classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree with a national inter
• The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver of the job offer requirement, but the substance of the proposed e
• The Beneficiary, sponsored by a private airline, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability in a
• The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree; the sp