This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, a dentist, planned to own and operate a dental company in Florida offering general and specialized dental services, including a mobile dental unit to serve underserved rural populations.
Field: dentistry · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive
“assertions without more are insufficient to conclude that an endeavor is of national importance”
“the labor certification process exists to address labor shortages”
“the RIMS II modeling tool used by the Petitioner to project job creation relies on various assumptions, which makes it an insufficient basis to support his argument”
“the scope of the Petitioner's work is limited to his patients”
“the relevant question is not the importance of the industry or profession in which the individual will work”
“the record does not show that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor stands to sufficiently extend beyond his patients to impact the industry more broadly”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- business plan · discounted
“the record does not show that benefits to the U.S. regional or national economy resulting from the Petitioner's endeavor would reach the level of "substantial positive economic effects"”
AAO decision text - recommendation letter · discounted
“the opinion letter does not sufficiently explain how the Petitioner's service to his patients will be of national importance”
AAO decision text - recommendation letter · discounted
“the reference letters do not sufficiently address the proposed endeavor or explain why it is of national importance”
AAO decision text - media · discounted
“the articles do not discuss the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor or how his endeavor will be of national importance”
AAO decision text - contract revenue · discounted
“he must provide more specific information or evidence to understand how any positive job creation would be attributable to his future work”
AAO decision text
Where this case turned
- Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
- Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
- Letters conclusory · p1 — letters praise skills in general terms without tracing specific impact
- Local, not national scope · p1 — impact confined to clients / a region
- Occupational shortage argument rejected · p1 — argues a labor shortage — the labor-certification question, not Dhanasar
Notable
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the underlying EB-2 classification (advanced degree/exceptional ability) because prong 1 was dispositive; also notably rejected a RIMS II economic-multiplier job-creation model as too assumption-laden to support national importance claims.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.3
- Matter of L-A-C-
- Matter of V-K-
- Poursina v. USCIS
What this case teaches
Analyst reading of the decision text.
Petitioner failed to show the endeavor's impact would extend beyond his individual patients/clinic to the broader field, region, or national economy, despite assertions of shortage-area service and job creation.
Support national-importance claims with rigorous, endeavor-specific data on scaled impact (not generic industry importance or unverified economic modeling) and tie expert letters directly to that impact.
moderate
public_health · economic_job_creation · economic_growth_generic · geographic_or_shortage_area · field_advancement
person_focused
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Beneficiary proposed to establish an asset investment management and compliance advisory firm in New York offering c
- The Petitioner proposed to develop and commercialize zeolite-based products in the United States, including agricultural
- The Petitioner proposed to operate a medical billing and healthcare revenue cycle management firm in the United States,
- The Petitioner proposed to establish and lead as CEO a cybersecurity and crisis management company in Florida, offering
- The Petitioner proposed to establish and operate an IT consultancy company in Michigan providing cloud migration, cybers