NIW Bearings
dismissedDEC062024_04B52032024-12-06 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a Brazilian-trained dentist, sought to work in the U.S. as a chief executive and entrepreneur, claiming his endeavor would benefit the U.S. healthcare system and economy.

Field: dentistry / entrepreneurship · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

The Petitioner's Brazilian dentistry degree was found to be an undergraduate/bachelor's-level degree, not a doctorate, and dentistry customarily requires a doctoral degree that cannot be satisfied through a combination of bachelor's degree plus five years of progressive experience under 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2). This was dispositive; the AAO declined to reach the Dhanasar prongs.

How the evidence was treated

  • degree · discounted
    his academic certificates clearly state that the degree he earned is an undergraduate degree
    AAO decision text
  • recommendation letter · discounted
    do not claim that the Petitioner holds the foreign equivalent of a DDS or DMD, nor do they address this
    AAO decision text
  • resume experience · ignored

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

AAO relied on the Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH) entry for Dentists to determine that dentistry customarily requires a doctoral degree, thus barring the bachelor's-plus-experience equivalency route; the Director had not fully analyzed the Dhanasar prongs and AAO expressly declined to reach them given the threshold failure.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • Flores v. Garland
  • Matter of L-A-C-

Cases in adjacent profiles