NIW Bearings
dismissedDEC052024_02B52032024-12-05 · appeal · Nebraska Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner proposed to work as a financial manager and start his own company importing and exporting mining and construction equipment/parts between the U.S., Mongolia, and other countries.

Field: financial management / import-export of mining equipment · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — addressed

AAO questioned whether the Petitioner's degree was from an accredited institution and whether he had five years of progressive experience, but reserved this issue as unnecessary given the dispositive NIW analysis.

Prong 1 — national importancenot established

the business plan does not adequately support these projections of job and revenue creation and does not explain in detail how its forecasts were calculated
he has not detailed how the claimed creation of 33 direct jobs and 165 indirect jobs by year five demonstrates a significant potential to employ U.S. workers
simply working in an important industry is insufficient to establish the proposed endeavor's national importance
he does not elaborate in detail on the Petitioner's future work and why it, in particular, would be nationally important
the fact that the Petitioner' proposed endeavor may be in a HUBZone is irrelevant to whether the Petitioner's endeavor rises to a level of national importance

AAO decision text

Prong 2 — well positionednot established · dispositive

the Petitioner failed to provide the requested documentation reflecting his plans to financially support his proposed endeavor, including corroboration of his alleged $1,000,000 initial investment
the Petitioner points to the success of his family's company in Mongolia, he does corroborate his claim with any evidence
As the Petitioner has not meaningfully contested the Director's grounds for denial under this prong, he has not overcome them

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • business plan · discounted
    the business plan does not adequately support these projections of job and revenue creation
    AAO decision text
  • recommendation letter · discounted
    they provide little probative information to establish the national importance of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor
    AAO decision text
  • degree · discounted
    the documentation does not appear to establish that he possesses an advanced degree from an accredited college or university
    AAO decision text
  • resume experience · discounted
    the evidence does not appear to show that he acquired five years of full-time, progressive experience in the field
    AAO decision text
  • other · discounted
    The articles and reports, however, provide only general background information on these subjects and do not specifically relate to or discuss the Petitioner's proposed endeavor
    AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Business plan speculative · p1projections without a documented basis or steps
  • Economic claims unsupported · p1job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
  • Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
  • Letters conclusory · p1letters praise skills in general terms without tracing specific impact
  • Local, not national scope · p1impact confined to clients / a region
  • Funding absent · p2no documented funding or resources behind the plan
  • Record of success insufficient · p2a claimed track record the documents do not establish
1,312coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

AAO reserved the threshold EB-2 advanced-degree question (raising serious doubts about degree accreditation and progressive experience) as unnecessary given the dispositive NIW analysis, but explicitly warned the Petitioner to address these issues in any future NIW filings. AAO also withdrew the Director's favorable finding on prong 1 despite affirming denial, finding national importance not established even though the Director had found it satisfied. Notably rejected the HUBZone/SBA set-aside argument as irrelevant since the Petitioner did not meet ownership criteria for the program.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • INA 203(b)(2)

Cases in adjacent profiles