NIW Bearings
dismissedDEC022024_02B52032024-12-02 · motion_reconsider · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner sought to continue his career in the United States as a skydiving instructor, claiming his work would impact individuals' health and address a shortage in his field.

Field: skydiving instruction · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

Prior appellate decision found Petitioner not eligible for underlying EB-2 classification, though Director's denial had not addressed this and it was not the sole basis for dismissal.

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

he did not establish his endeavor would result in broader implications at a level commensurate with national importance, or otherwise result in substantial economic effects

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    the Petitioner again submits the same brief initially submitted on appeal with only a passing acknowledgement of our dismissal of his motion to reconsider
    AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Economic claims unsupported · p1job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
  • Endeavor too vague · p1described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
  • Occupational shortage argument rejected · p1argues a labor shortage — the labor-certification question, not Dhanasar
2,501coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This is a second motion to reconsider following a prior appeal dismissal and a prior motion to reconsider dismissal; the AAO found the Petitioner merely resubmitted the same appeal brief without addressing the prior decision's reasoning, citing Matter of O-S-G- (BIA) for the principle that a motion to reconsider cannot simply reargue the original brief.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)
  • Matter of O-S-G-

Cases in adjacent profiles