NIW Bearings
dismissedAUG262024_02B52032024-08-26 · combined · Nebraska Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, an entrepreneur in the technology field, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability with a national interest waiver of the job offer requirement.

Field: technology · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    Reasserting previously stated facts or resubmitting previously provided evidence does not constitute "new facts."
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This decision never reaches the NIW merits or exceptional-ability threshold; it solely addresses a combined motion to reopen/reconsider a prior AAO summary dismissal of the appeal (for failure to timely submit a brief identifying errors of law or fact under 8 C.F.R. 103.3(a)(1)(v)). The AAO found the Petitioner submitted only duplicate evidence and no cogent legal argument, so both motions were dismissed without addressing prongs 1-3 or the threshold exceptional-ability/advanced-degree issue.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)
  • Matter of Coelho

Cases in adjacent profiles