NIW Bearings
dismissedAUG242023_01B52032023-08-24 · motion_reopen · Nebraska Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner proposed to work as a historical architect, with work centered on the curation and refurbishment of a permanent exhibition related to Islamic culture and its importance to inter-faith dialogue.

Field: historical architecture / Islamic art and culture · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

we considered teaching activities and concluded that they do not rise to the level of having national importance because they do not impact a field of endeavor more broadly than the immediate effect or influence on the cohort receiving the teaching

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • other · discounted
    their book is not evidence of a new fact
    AAO decision text
  • recommendation letter · discounted
    They provide generalized assertions of the importance of the Petitioner's work in their field.
    AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Endeavor too vague · p1described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
  • Local, not national scope · p1impact confined to clients / a region
1,581coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This is a fourth-round motion (after appeal and three prior combined motions), all dismissed; AAO applies strict 'new facts' limitation under 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1) rather than re-analyzing prongs substantively, treating the book and letters as rehashing previously considered evidence.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5
  • Matter of Coelho

Cases in adjacent profiles