NIW Bearings
dismissedAUG142024_02B52032024-08-14 · combined · Nebraska Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a historical architect, sought to pursue work in historical architecture that she argued carried national importance sufficient to warrant a national interest waiver.

Field: historical architecture · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    does not present any new facts and does not submit any new evidence
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This is a decision on the Petitioner's fifth or sixth successive motion following an earlier appeal dismissal on prong 1 national importance grounds; the AAO does not re-analyze the prongs on the merits, but dismisses solely for failure to satisfy motion-to-reopen (no new facts/evidence) and motion-to-reconsider (no legal/policy error shown) standards under 8 C.F.R. 103.5.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)
  • Matter of Coelho

Cases in adjacent profiles