This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The petitioner sought to work as a pastor offering pastoral counseling services and to grow a firm engaging other counselors to help communities cope with grief and hardship.
Field: pastoral counseling / mental health ministry · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive
“the matter here is not whether mental health care or its related topics are nationally important”
“the Petitioner must demonstrate the national importance of his specific, proposed endeavor of providing his services as a pastor through his company in the Pennsylvania area”
“the letters do not show the broader impact of the Petitioner's work”
“the Petitioner did not sufficiently explain or demonstrate how his particular proposed endeavor would have any projected U.S. economic impact or job creation”
“the record does not show through supporting documentation how the Petitioner's endeavor sufficiently extends beyond his prospective clients”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- recommendation letter · discounted
“the letters do not show the broader impact of the Petitioner's work”
AAO decision text
Where this case turned
- Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
- Endeavor too vague · p1 — described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
- Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
- Local, not national scope · p1 — impact confined to clients / a region
Notable
AAO explicitly states each reason (national importance failure) is an independent and alternate basis for dismissal, and declined to reach prongs 2 and 3 as unnecessary.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- Matter of L-A-C-
What this case teaches
Analyst reading of the decision text.
Petitioner failed to show the specific pastoral counseling endeavor had broader field-wide or national economic/social impact beyond his own clients and locality.
Support prong-1 claims with evidence of the endeavor's broader, quantifiable impact on the field or economy—not just personal credentials or local client relationships.
vague
public_health · economic_job_creation · economic_growth_generic
person_focused
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, an aircraft mechanic and instructor, proposed to enhance aviation maintenance training programs, support
- The Petitioner seeks EB-2 classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree with a national inter
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver of the job offer requirement, but the substance of the proposed e
- The Beneficiary, sponsored by a private airline, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability in a
- The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree; the sp