NIW Bearings
dismissedAPR222024_07B52032024-04-22 · combined · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The record did not consistently establish what the petitioner's proposed endeavor actually was, nor its national importance, according to the AAO's underlying appellate decision.

Read the decision (uscis.gov)

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

the Petitioner had not submitted consistent evidence to establish the national importance, or even the precise nature, of her proposed endeavor

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    the Petitioner makes vague and general assertions that USCIS disregarded unspecified evidence
    AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Endeavor too vague · p1described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
1,581coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

Petitioner raised an irrelevant Fourth Amendment claim (alleging evidence was not properly analyzed by 'the Service'), which the AAO rejected as unrelated to the grounds of the prior decision, citing Matter of O-S-G-. The motion was dismissed for failing to identify overlooked evidence or specific legal/factual errors in the June 2023 appellate decision, without re-analyzing prongs 2 or 3.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(i)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)
  • Matter of O-S-G-

Cases in adjacent profiles