This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, an entrepreneur in the insurance sector, sought an EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver, though the specific business endeavor was not detailed in this decision.
Field: insurance · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
How the evidence was treated
- motion resubmission · discounted
“a motion to reconsider is not a process by which the party may submit, in essence, the same brief”
AAO decision text
This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
This decision is procedural only, addressing a motion to reconsider a prior AAO appeal dismissal; it does not reach the merits of the NIW prongs. The Petitioner submitted no new evidence and made only general allegations of error, including an unexplained due process claim, without identifying specific legal or factual errors in the prior decision.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
- INA 291
- Matter of O-S-G-
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Beneficiary proposed to establish an asset investment management and compliance advisory firm in New York offering c
- The Petitioner proposed to develop and commercialize zeolite-based products in the United States, including agricultural
- The Petitioner proposed to operate a medical billing and healthcare revenue cycle management firm in the United States,
- The Petitioner proposed to establish and lead as CEO a cybersecurity and crisis management company in Florida, offering
- The Petitioner proposed to establish and operate an IT consultancy company in Michigan providing cloud migration, cybers