NIW Bearings
dismissedSEP302024_11B52032024-09-30 · motion_reconsider · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a medical technologist, proposed to assess the accuracy and reliability of diagnostic testing devices for infectious diseases through developing and implementing quality control systems, protocols, and methods.

Field: medical technology / diagnostic testing · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

we noted that the submitted evidence relates to the substantial merit and importance of the field of diagnostic testing, rather than the broader implications of the Petitioner's specific endeavor.
without sufficient information or evidence regarding any projected economic impact or job creation directly attributable to his future work

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • other · discounted
    the submitted evidence relates to the substantial merit and importance of the field of diagnostic testing, rather than the broader implications of the Petitioner's specific endeavor
    AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Economic claims unsupported · p1job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
  • Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
2,501coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This is a motion to reconsider following a prior AAO dismissal on appeal; the AAO's review is limited to whether its prior decision misapplied law or policy, and it reaffirms its original prong 1 analysis without reaching prongs 2 or 3.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5

Cases in adjacent profiles