NIW Bearings
dismissedSEP292023_05B52032023-09-29 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

A Brazilian-trained nurse with over 12 years of clinical experience sought to continue nursing work in the United States, performing a combination of administrative and clinical duties for an as-yet-undetermined healthcare facility.

Field: nursing · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — addressed

AAO agreed she qualifies as an advanced degree professional based on a bachelor's degree in nursing plus more than five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience.

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

the Petitioner has not demonstrated that her specific endeavor would have national economic implications
the Petitioner's proposed endeavor is vague because her future U.S. position has yet to be determined
she has not established that her specific endeavor would improve healthcare, or boost the economy, broadly enough to be deemed nationally important

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • resume experience · credited
  • degree · credited

Where this case turned

  • Endeavor too vague · p1described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
  • Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
1,581coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The Petitioner had not yet secured a specific U.S. employer or position at filing, which the AAO treated as compounding the vagueness of her national-importance claim; the decision also notes the Schedule A shortened labor certification process for nurses but finds that this does not obviate the national-importance requirement for the specific endeavor.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • Matter of L-A-C-

Cases in adjacent profiles