NIW Bearings
dismissedSEP232024_09B52032024-09-23 · combined · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner originally proposed to continue working as a general and operations professional in engineering, advising U.S. companies on planning, directing, and coordinating operations of public or private sector organizations; on RFE he attempted to substitute a heavy equipment rental service for construction and disaster recovery.

Field: general and operations management / engineering · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    The Petitioner does not identify a new fact, nor does he submit documentary evidence of such a fact
    AAO decision text
  • business plan · discounted
    This was a material change to the original endeavor.
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The decision does not reach the NIW prongs; it is a motion decision addressing only whether the motion to reopen/reconsider met procedural requirements under 8 C.F.R. 103.5. The underlying appellate dismissal (not this decision) had found the proposed heavy equipment rental business was a material change to the originally filed endeavor (general/operations engineering advising), citing Matter of Izummi, and reviewed the petition only as originally filed.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5
  • Matter of Coelho
  • Matter of Izummi

Cases in adjacent profiles