NIW Bearings
dismissedSEP112023_01B52032023-09-11 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The petitioner proposed to work as a computer systems analyst, providing SAP implementation services to mid-size U.S. businesses through his own consultancy.

Field: computer systems analysis / SAP implementation · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

The Director concluded the Petitioner met only two of the three required evidentiary criteria under 8 C.F.R. 204.5(h)(3) for exceptional ability, despite claiming five; AAO affirmed this finding as dispositive and did not reach the NIW prongs.

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    he repeats his RFE response regarding these three criteria word for word, and submits copies of the same evidence
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

Although the Director found the proposed endeavor of substantial merit under Dhanasar, the AAO declined to reach the NIW prongs because the threshold exceptional-ability finding was dispositive of the appeal, citing INS v. Bagamasbad and Matter of L-A-C- for declining to make advisory findings on unnecessary issues.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • Chen v. INS
  • Matter of L-A-C-

Cases in adjacent profiles