NIW Bearings
dismissedOCT302024_01B52032024-10-30 · combined · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a veterinary assistant, sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver, though this motion decision does not describe the specific endeavor beyond her occupation.

Field: veterinary assistance · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    the Petitioner has not presented new facts
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This decision addresses a second combined motion to reopen and reconsider, filed after the AAO summarily dismissed a first combined motion. The AAO's review here is expressly limited to reviewing the summary dismissal decision itself, not the merits of the underlying NIW prongs; the prior appellate decision (not this one) had affirmed the well-positioned (prong 2) failure while withdrawing unfavorable findings on exceptional-ability eligibility and national importance (prong 1). No prong analysis occurs in this decision because the Petitioner merely resubmitted prior evidence and failed to identify new facts or legal/factual error.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)
  • INA 203(b)(2)
  • Matter of Coelho

Cases in adjacent profiles