dismissedOCT152024_02B52032024-10-15 · combined · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner sought to continue working as a pilot and pilot instructor, including developing multi-crew operations (MCO) and multi-crew cooperation (MCC) training courses to address pilot shortages and improve training efficiency.

Field: aviation/piloting · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

“the record did not establish his endeavor is nationally important as contemplated in Dhanasar”

“a labor shortage in a field alone does not generally render a proposed endeavor nationally important under the Dhanasar framework, because labor shortages are addressed through the labor certification process”

“the Petitioner's training did not impact the field more broadly at a level commensurate with national important”

“the record did not establish the Petitioner's endeavor would result in substantial positive economic effects commensurate with national importance”

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

business plan · discounted
“the record did not establish the Petitioner's training programs would impact his field at a level commensurate with national importance”
AAO decision text
recommendation letter · discounted
“these letters and his past accomplishments did not establish the broader implications or national importance of his proposed endeavor”
AAO decision text
other · discounted
“they did not discuss his specific endeavor and therefore did not establish the prospective impact of his endeavor would rise to the level of national importance”
AAO decision text
motion resubmission · discounted
“he continues to rely on the same claims previously addressed in our appellate decision”
AAO decision text

Where this case turned

Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
Endeavor too vague · p1 — described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
Occupational shortage argument rejected · p1 — argues a labor shortage — the labor-certification question, not Dhanasar

2,501coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →

Notable

This is a decision on combined motions to reopen/reconsider following a prior AAO appellate dismissal; the AAO found the Petitioner merely reasserted prior arguments without new facts or legal error, citing Matter of O-S-G- for the principle that broad disagreement is insufficient for reconsideration.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

8 C.F.R. 103.5
Matter of Coelho
Matter of O-S-G-

What this case teaches

Analyst reading of the decision text.

Decisive factor

Petitioner failed to show his specific training endeavor (not generic industry importance or labor shortage) would have impact rising to national importance or substantial economic effects.

Transferable lesson

Tie evidence directly to the specific proposed endeavor's projected scale of impact, not generic industry statistics, credentials, or labor-shortage arguments alone.

Endeavor framing

moderate

National-importance theory

economic_job_creation · geographic_or_shortage_area · us_competitiveness · field_advancement

Evidence targeting

person_focused

Cases in adjacent profiles

← Back to the case explorer